Apocalypse Cow wrote a substantial comment to my last post, for which I thank him. Contrary to what he thinks, it won't end up "sparking a big debate" (unfortunately) between us. I'm not a Utopian Socialist, and the corruption of which he speaks is impossible to avoid. I just want to make a couple of points, and I hope they make sense. I took one too many tramadol, and the room is spinning a bit. If it spins a lot, ala Dorothy's house, I'll take a powder and return to the post later.
Equality is both impossible to achieve and, most of the time, undesirable. What I seek is class consciousness that will give the laborers of the world the intellectual foundation for international unionization. Unions exist primarily to collective bargain, and that is the heart of the whole concept of socialism, at least as it has evolved. One worker alone is nothing, but united they are a force greater than any cabal, corporation or capitalist institution. Anyone with a brother knows that there will be fighting and disagreements, but the key ideal here is to stand together to overcome wage slavery and tyranny.
And that has happened, again and again, in the real world. The impact of unions is still seen in the workplace. But if you'll allow me to skip ahead a bit, my problem is with capitalism. And there are many ways to deal with it. First, let me quickly justify my hatred of capitalism.
Capitalism is a messy term to define. For brevity's sake, I'll stick to corporations, which represent a major institutions and a functioning mechanism that is critical to capitalism. A corporation has a single goal above all others; to make a profit. That puts corporations at odds with the rest of society. Whether the corporation is public or private, it doesn't matter, it exists to make a profit for the owners/investors. Without regulation, corporations will do absolutely anything if it means making money. Without corporate regulation there are no corporate ethics, as ethics are tied to regulation. I don't know if you buy that or not, but here is a short list of things unregulated corporations have done:
Hire and take advantage of children, pollute without restraint, ignore safety needs in the workplace, pay next to nothing, callously manipulate legislation, and price fix with other corporations. That list goes on and on, but you get the point. I don't believe in evil, and that people are evil, but corporations may as well be. They are the enemy of anyone who can't afford to or is disinclined to buy stock or buy the company outright. Check out the movie
The Corporation to get the whole schpiel. I'm trying not to bore people too much, here. My point, however, is that individuals in a company are just people trying to live well and are usually decent. Put them together in a corporation, however, and they can do unspeakably nasty things to the world and the people living in it.
So then the big question is what to do about these corporations? You can regulate them, ala the New Deal and the social democracies of Western Europe. Or you can destroy them and replace them with "state capitalism" like the Soviet Union. Just for the record, China is a sort of hybrid that has combined "free trade zones" inside a Communist/military state. Socialists talk about a "third way" that combines a democracy with strong civil liberties with something called "workplace democracy." That's basically forcing corporations to accept a union structure via elected workers' committees. It's worth mentioning that in political science terms, you can't have socialism without democracy. By definition, socialists are pro-democratic. That's one reason that Hitler rounded up the socialists even before he got to the Jews; politically, they were a threat to his desire for absolute control. Ironically, "national socialism" was
strongly pro-capitalist and industrialist. They called themselves "socialists" because socialism was popular among the German people at the time.
Class equality is a straw man. The key is class-consciousness. In this country, the working class has a tendency towards self-loathing. Feeling like a failure for being poor or even middle class is a distinctly American pathology. Corruption in trade unions is recognized and most people take the attitude that it is an unacceptable price to pay for the right to collective bargain. Strangely, corporate malfeasance is seen as just the way things are, and accepted. Closer inspection reveals the cause for this, and it has to do with self-loathing among an entire class of people.
There is no big argument, though, because we fundamentally agree as best as I can see. We agree that total equality is impossible, and possibly undesirable (
lumpen proletariat). But greater equality is very possible by doing two simple things:
1. Public ownership and regulation of non-profit corporations aimed at utilities and those services deemed too important for the game of profit-seeking; national health insurance, car insurance, flood insurance (insurance of any kind), airlines, oil and gas companies, utilities.
2. For the private businesses that are left, we have the aforementioned institutionalized unions and very strong regulation.
That's all it would take to level the playing field a great deal and increase the quality of life dramatically. Capitalists, still left in a limited capacity, will still try to subvert democracy (as they do now in countless ways, just look at the Bankruptcy Bill passed a couple of summers ago). Seeking total equality is like hunting ghosts, but my humble demands will go a long way to making a better country and world.
One last point, about the term
survival of the fittest. I'd be remiss if I didn't say that that is a reference to procreation. The fitness of an organism is defined by it's ability to produce viable offspring. So the innate survival instinct to which you refer isn't akin to a general desire to procreate. The instinct itself IS (generally speaking) the desire to procreate, or rather the vague compulsion. Having children is a selfish act, an act people engage in less when there is no abject poverty and a high standard of living. Birth rates are lowest in places where the quality of life is highest; W. European and Scandinavian countries.
My only point there is that "instincts" can be impacted by economics and social engineering for greater general welfare. It's ironic that you chose an example of human behavior that can be affected by socio-economic policy to make the point that human animals can't be deterred in their instinctual compulsions. Another way to say it is that greed is not part of our DNA, at least to the degree that we encourage and cultivate it in our current world economy. Aspects of our natural inclinations can be embraced. They can also be measurably reduced by a society that has the right value system.
In conclusion, my goal is to reduce inequality, celebrate class warfare to increase class consciousness, and strategically undermine the goals of corporate capitalism via unions, a free press, free elections, and general hell-raising. But we do agree that there is no Utopia, and total equality is impossible.
When it comes to scholarly matters, I'm downright elitist. The people behind Wikipedia have more faith in the academic wisdom of the masses than I do. And these days, in addition to being an existential nihilist and a meta-ethical relativist, I'm insanely negative about what is going to happen in the future. My ideals are attainable, but they won't be attained in my lifetime, or probably for 1,000 years, if ever. My only point here is that what I want is
possible, and with the same DNA we have now.
Cheers.
I'd much rather stalk deer hunters. To follow one into the wood. Pretend to be his friend, share a cold one with him, then as he turns and walks into the woods ahead of you, you take your pocket knife a ram it ever-so-gently into the area just under the occipital lobe of his skull. Just about where the spine and skull meet in an Achilles' Heel of nerves and arteries just below the surface. A 6 inch knife would do it quickly and painlessly, which is why you're glad you're using a 3 inch knife.
As the big hunter spasmodically gesticulates on the ground, in the process of going paralyzed, he looks like a Parkinson's patient is giving a one man puppet show. There is blood, and spinal fluid, but it's not too messy. A tidy way to bring down of the Earth's largest animals, the human being. But to ease his passing, you consider dropping a boulder on his little head. Then you remember that people who hunt for the fun of it, instead of out of necessity, are douchebags. So you let the bastard thrash around some more. Before the big hunter dies, you cut his eyes out, turn them around, and cram them back in; the optic nerves hanging on each side of the nose. In between laughs of glee, mingled with quiet moments of deep, serious concentration, you cut his nose and lips off, too. He finally dies, chocking on his own nose shoved down his throat.
You'll let him ripen until morning, then you'll blow him up with 30 sticks of dynamite in a raft on that little pond. It will be like he never existed. In a way, he never did. I defy you to find him.